Exodus 19-40 Q+R

Tim and Jon respond to questions from our listeners on Exodus 19-40.

Episode 4
Apr 4, 2017
Play Episode
Show Notes

This summer we are re-releasing a Q+R series we did on YouTube. Tim and Jon discuss questions in front of a livestream about different books in the Old Testament. In this episode, the guys discuss stories in the second half of the book of Exodus. You can view the original video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNpTha80yyE&t=5s and our video on the book of Exodus here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0GhR-2kPKI

Thank you to all our supporters!

Questions and Timestamps:

What is the relationship between the Sinai Covenant and the rest of the Bible? (3:27) Is there any symbolism in the tabernacle that’s recognizable? (9:10) Why do the Ten Commandments appear more than once in the Torah? (13:50) Did other cultures adopt Hebrew laws? And what is the relation between Hebrew laws and other ancient laws like the code of Hammurabi? (24:34) and (26:15) Did God change his mind about destroying Israel? (27:15) What is manna in the Old Testament? (38:28) Did God actually expect Israel to follow all the laws in the Old Testament? (42:20)

Show Music:

Defender Instrumental by Rosasharn Music

Scripture References
Exodus 32
Exodus 19:5-6
Exodus 32:9-10
Exodus 20
Deuteronomy 5
Exodus 34
Exodus 32:11-14
Exodus 34:6-7
Exodus 16
Romans 2-3

Podcast Date: April 3, 2017


Speakers in the audio file:

Jon Collins

Tim Mackie

Jon: Hey, this is Jon at The Bible Project. In this episode of the podcast, we're going to

look at the second part of our conversation on our YouTube live stream that we did

over a year ago. It was a question and response episode with fellow YouTubers on

the book of Exodus. This is Exodus 19 through 40.

If you've been listening to these Q+Rs this summer on our podcast, you know the

audio isn't as good as it normally is. And so, we apologize for that.

Today, we're going to get into question like, did God actually expect Israel to follow

all the laws in the Old Testament, and is there anything symbolic that we should care

about in the Old Testament tabernacle? Thanks for listening. Here we go.

Tim: Hey, guys. How are you doing? Welcome to the Bible Project Live Stream Q+R.

Jon: Q+R, not Q+A. Question and response. Today, we're going to go through Exodus 19

through 40. We've done two different videos on it. One in the Torah series, which is

the fully animated one that came out a couple years ago. And then the read

scripture series came out earlier this year, and it walks through this poster here. I

don't know if you can see it. Oh, yeah, you can't see it.

We already have a bunch of questions coming in. It's great. Keep asking your

questions here on the live feed. What we do is we mark them on a spreadsheet, and

then we can kind of look at them and keep up on them. So the more the merrier.

This is Exodus. Just as a quick little summary just so we're all on the same page. This

is the Exodus story that you're familiar with, where Moses and the 10 plagues and

getting out of Egypt. Then, 19 through 40 is coming to Mount Sinai, getting the

covenant. We'll maybe talk about that.

The Ten Commandments, all these other laws. Building the tabernacle is a big part of

this. Our blueprints.

Tim: This is the part in the story of the Torah where through Genesis it's like actionpacked

- Exodus story, just the narrative is flowing, exciting. And then, at chapter 19,

the story just grinds to a screeching halt almost. The stories come in snippets and in

between the snippets of stories are huge blocks of laws. So something really radical


What's interesting, most people aren't familiar with the Exodus story but once

people get to Mount Sinai, most people's to actually stop reading the Bible.

Jon: That's kind of where it gets really tough.

Tim: Yeah, a lot of people drop out of the story, but these are crucial, crucial parts of the

Bible story. So we're excited to talk about that.

Jon: You read through the blueprints of the tabernacle once and feel like a hero. And

then you got to read through again, and you're like, "Why am I doing this?" Then the

golden calf incident, which we're quite familiar with as a story, and then Moses

pleading with God and at the very end can enter this beautiful tabernacle that they

made. That's the outline of the story. We have a bunch of questions. Keep sending

them in and we will jump in.

Tim: Actually, Kickpuncher [SP] asked a great question overall, broad here, about what

happens once we get to chapter 19. Kickpuncher, you asked, "How does the Sinai

covenant fit into the overall storyline?

The Israelites come out of their slavery in Egypt, and then through the wilderness

here, and Moses leads them to the foot of Mount Sinai, which was pointed to

actually all the way back here in chapter 3. And then they would come here.

And so, what God enters into is a covenant. Which isn't the first time that you've

heard that word in the storyline of the Torah.

Jon: Did you hear it with Abraham?

Tim: Yeah, it's connected with Abraham. A covenant with Abraham, a covenant with

Noah, and all creation in chapter 9. Covenants is actually one of the main ways the

author of the Pentateuch has brought coherence and unity to the storyline.

The covenant with Noah was to make the world a secure place, where God would

carry out the drama of what He was going to do to rescue humanity. Then the

covenant with Abraham and the family of Abraham was his commitment to bring

blessing, restore His blessing to all humanity and the rebellious nations.

Jon: The word covenant itself is not a word we use a lot. I remember when we were

making the covenant video, we talked about it. But we use the word in marriage -

the covenant of marriage.

Tim: Yes, that's right.

Jon: What does that mean to them that it's a covenant?

Tim: It means partnership. It's like an official signing, a formalized partnership between

two people to accomplish some goal together.

Jon: That's why kings made covenants with each other back then?

Tim: Yes, kings make covenant. "If you do this, give me your crops in this percentage and

I'll let you use this land. And if you ever cross the boundary lines, I'll cut your head

off." Or something like that. That's the thing.

Jon: That's how they work. "It's like, "You do this and this will happen, and you don't do

this and this will happen."

Tim: "Here's the consequence." So what's interesting, the biblical story tells the story of

the Creator God who when He wants to redeem and rescue His world, He does it by

entering into partnerships with humans. That's interesting. We might just think God

ought to parachute little relief packets of salvation to everybody like UN helicopters.

Jon: Or just come in and just be like, "Let me fix this. I'm going to do it myself, but get

out of my way."

Tim: But the biblical stories about a God who wants to engage humans in the fullness of

their dignity and responsibility and work through them. So the story of Israel is

God's commitment to somehow—you don't know yet how exactly in the story—

bring His blessing to all the nations through this family.

So, the covenant that he makes with the nation of Israel here at Mount Sinai is kind

of focusing in on the covenant with Abraham. And right here, the opening words of

chapter 19, when they came to Sinai, they're crucial, crucial. God says that He is

asking a whole nation to obey the terms of the covenant, which are going to be

revealed in the 10 commandments and the laws will follow.

And God says, "If you obey the terms of the covenant," He uses to phrases, he says,

"You'll be a kingdom of priests and a holy nation." Priests are like mediators’ gobetweens

between the deity and a group of people. Here you have a people group,

Israel who's going to be a go-between the God of Israel, and then—

Jon: The nations?

Tim: It doesn't say at the foot of the mountain who they are priests to. You have to infer

it. But as a reader of the story—

Jon: So you're going to have a whole kingdom full of priests?

Tim: That's right. One whole nation.

Jon: Because normally a priest is going to serve the kingdom but there you got people

group there. And now everyone's a priest.

Tim: That's right.

Jon: Why would have everyone be a priest? That's like everyone being like a woods


[crosstalk 00:07:34]

Tim: It's a way of thinking about ancient Israel's vocation and purpose in the story that

God chose one family or nation among all the other nations. And He's going to do

something to them that makes them mediators of God to the nation so that when

other nations look at ancient Israel obeying the terms of the covenant, they say, "Oh,

my gosh, these are unique people. We want to be like them."

Just to land the plane on that question, it's a huge step forward in the storyline of

the Torah because you realize now that it's going to be through this family of people

being faithful to the terms of the covenant, that's how the blessing, the divine

blessing of Abraham's going to go out to all the nations.

Jon: And so all these laws that they get are all like the terms of the agreement?

Tim: Well, yeah, they are the author selecting from Israel's covenant.

Jon: Oh, because we don't have a whole covenant?

Tim: Yeah, we don't have the whole body of laws as it was revealed to the Israel whether

it would form their constitution. But the author of the Torah has selected 613 of

them and placed them strategically within the story to give us a robust

understanding of what it was like for them to live by that covenant with God. That's

how it fits into the storyline. Kickpuncher, great question.

Jon: Great question. And part of the covenant is the tabernacle as well then because

God's going to be there with them and that's where God's going to dwell?

Tim: Yeah, totally.

Jon: So that's how it all fits together?

Tim: Yeah. Actually, somebody had a question about the symbolism in the tabernacle

which was kind of cool. Oh, yeah, Scott. Scott Noyes, right here you asked, "Is there

any cool symbolism in the detailed design of the tabernacle that modern readers

wouldn't recognize?" Oh, you betcha.

Here's what's interesting. We built it into the poster in both versions of the video—

we have two versions of the second half of Exodus—that every part of the tabernacle

design is loaded with Garden of Eden symbolism, or heaven and earth symbolism,

which is actually all connected together.

So the point is that the tabernacle, God's going to commission the people to be His

priests, and then He's going to plant his garden of Eden presence right in the middle

of it in this tabernacle or temple where heaven on earth overlap.

And so, yeah, all of the curtains have fruit trees, pomegranates, there's angelic creatures

connected to those Cherubim creatures in the garden. All of that is this recreation of

Eden. It's a portable Eden is what I call it.

Jon: A portable Eden.

Jon: A portable Eden. Which itself is just symbol that what Israel is, is a people who

embody what God wants for the whole world, which is for God's divine presence to

flood the whole creation and all of the nations.

Jon: To be everywhere. And even in Genesis, when we learn how God creates the world,

there are people who say that there's tabernacle language in there.

Tim: Oh, in Genesis 1.

Jon: Yeah, with the days or—

Tim: Correct. Yeah, that's right. There's lots of temple ideas and imagery going on in

Genesis 1.

Jon: What helps me is to remember that if you lived back at this time, you'd be very

familiar with temples, and you would know this is a place where the God of that city

dwells and I go there to worship God, and it's a sacred place. And when God creates

the world, He kind of talks about the whole world being—

Tim: Described as that kind of place.

Jon: That kind of place. And we learn later in the biblical narrative that's the whole world

is where God reigns.

Tim: That's right. The biblical story ends in the new creation described in terms of a new

Jerusalem or a new temple, but it's a place which is a temple therefore there doesn't

need to be a temple because the presence of God and the lamb are there in the city

Garden of Eden.

Jon: So this point in the story though, God accommodates what's going on this right, and

says, "I will live with you and dwelt among you, and so build me this tabernacle?"

Tim: Yeah. There's actually a lot of symbols in the tabernacle, really detailed ones, that we

don't have access to what their ancient cultural meaning would have been. Like the

length of the polls that the priests are to carry, or why are there so many layers of

curtains over the holy space. But then some are more clear because they are

mentioned elsewhere in the Bible about the angelic creatures, the gold and precious

jewels as an image of sacred uniqueness, that kind of thing.

As you're reading through, there are all kinds of details that are strange, but there

are all kinds of details that should trigger, echoes of the garden and all that kind of


Jon: This could turn into a big conversation about the tabernacle. Someone just asked

like, "How is that connected to Jesus?" Because there's like the time where Jesus is in

front of the temple, and he's like, "Tear down this temple and I'll rebuild it," and he's

referring to himself.

Tim: That's right, he's referring to himself.

Jon: So he's saying like, "I am actually the tabernacle. I'm the temple." John refers to him

as the tabernacle.

Tim: John refers to Jesus as God's tabernacle presence in human.

Jon: So this is very rich. There's so much there that could be talked about.

Tim: The temple theme here is one of the main red thread that holds the storyline of the

whole Bible together.

Jon: All the way to the very end of the Bible when there is no temple anymore.

Tim: So we traced it in the "Heaven and Earth" video. That was a place where we did that.

But there's much more.

Jon: We could do a whole nother

Tim: We could do a temple video. That would be really cool.

Jon: It would be cool.

Tim: Good questions.

Jon: Yeah, thanks, guys.

Tim: Let's see. Somebody asked about The Ten Commandments.

Jon: Who?

Tim: I don't know how to say your name. I think it's an abbreviation Aglowpick [SP].

Jon: Aglowpick.

Tim: Aglowpick1, who are you?

Jon: Tells us about that name Aglowpick1.

Tim: You asked a question about the 10 commandments. That's something that most

people don't often think about. And that's the fact that they appear more than one

time in the Torah.

There's a set of commandments. The Ten Commandments are given right here. It's

the first terms of the covenant right after setup in chapter 19. Then they appear in

chapter 20.

The Ten Commandments appear again and Deuteronomy chapter 5. And then also

there's a repetition of commands in the first block. They get repeated again and

chapter 34, which we don't quite mentioned in the poster right here. But you're

exactly right.

Here there's something really significant were in the storyline of what happens at

Sinai is that God gives The Ten Commandments and another block of commands. All

the Israelites are like, "Yes, we are so down for this." That's chapter 24. Then what

comes immediately after that is the block of tabernacle blueprints. So we're like,

"This thing's rolling, the relationship is set up."

Jon: Make it a sweet path for God to hang out in.

Tim: That's right. But the narrative is on pause, you're just getting the laws and the

blueprints. The last thing you heard out of the people's mouth is, "Sign us up for it."

The next moment in the narrative is right here in chapter 32 where Moses has been

upon the mountain for a while, and the people immediately with the absence of a

Moses as their leader they look up at the glory cloud, and what they immediately

want to do is reduce the significance of their God who rescued them down to a

physical shape that they have categories for. So they make the golden calf.

Jon: They start taking off their jewelry. I love how Aaron's like, "Yeah, we just started

throwing stuff in the fire and then out popped this calf. I don't know how it

happened." And then we go. Sorry, Moses.

Tim: It's such a blame shift right there.

Jon: The narrative is trying to say something very significant. First of all, the human

tendency is to reduce the divine down to the categories that we can handle and

make sense of, and that we're fickle and inconsistent creatures. Humans are.

One moment, they have hearts full of devotion and the next moment...I mean, in

making the golden calf, they're violating the first terms of the covenant that they just

said yes.

Jon: The number one term.

Tim: Which for readers, as you read the story, you're like, "Wait, these idiots, these

people." But that's how the story works because it's making you as the reader to

kind of feel a little bit superior to them. And that's often true in biblical narratives.

They depict the characters as idiots so that you think you're better than them until

you realize that you are them and that the narrator has been getting you to smile

but punching you in the gut at the same time. So that's how the story works is

saying that God's people from the start have been an unfaithful, unreliable bunch.

Jon: This started because there are two versions of The Ten Commandments?

Tim: Yes, that's right.

Jon: You're getting there?

Tim: I'm getting there.

Jon: Okay.

Tim: What God does—and there are some questions about this that we'll talk about—

God wants to call off the covenant. That's what He feels like. He says, "I'm over these


Jon: Which people want to talk about that too.

Tim: And then Moses intercedes on behalf of the people and reminds God that He's

signed on the dotted line. And God says, "Oh, yeah, I did that." Then what He does is

He repeats a whole block of the commands again from here. He repeats from here

as a way of reestablishing and healing the covenant relationship. So that's why the

repetition of the command's there.

It's just important to recognize that the laws are not there to make the first five

books of the Bible into a constitution. The laws are there because they help you to

make sense of the flow of the story. The story is the thing.

And that's what most modern readers because there's so many, we lost track of the

story, and we think that somehow these books are all about the law when in fact

they are about the story of the covenant.

Jon: Which is a good thing to bring up because a lot of people are asking about that. So

like, "How are we supposed to view, observe the Sabbath day? That's from the

Nadaje Fide [SP]. Sorry, that's a bad pronunciation. Someone else I just saw on the

live stream asked, "How are Christian supposed to obey these laws?"

So just in general, what I've heard you say before when we worked on "The Law"

video - which by the way, we have a whole video on the law. Just helpful starter. But

Tim: We did a long podcast discussion about answering both of those questions in detail.

Jon: So there will be more detail, but just briefly, what I remember is that even in this

story, kind of what you just said, we don't get the full constitution. We don't get

every single law. So the point obviously isn't to try to give you a complete set of

rules to live by.

Tim: Right. Just as a thesis statement, the purpose of the first five books of the Bible is

not to give you the reader the terms of the covenant precisely that you the reader

are supposed to relate to God by.

Jon: Even if you are an Israelite reading this, it wouldn't give you that, right?

Tim: Oh, sure. Because like an ancient Israelite is living in—

Jon: They have the covenant otherwise.

Tim: They are people existing in that covenant relationship.

Jon: So if I'm an Israelite, say like in Second Temple time, and I'm reading the Torah, even

as an Israelite who wants to follow the covenant to the tee I'm not using this as my


Tim: Well, that gets more into the history of Judaism because that's what the Torah

became. It became the constitution. It actually even become that by the time period

of Ezra, Nehemiah and the temple. But to make the Torah work as a law code, you

need more than the 613 laws that are in it. Which is why in Jewish tradition, the

mission and the Talmud provide thousands of more commandments to actually

make it workable.

That's the first thing is that alone tells us that, oh, if this is meant to be a law book,

it's not a very good one.

Jon: Right. Not very complete.

Tim: That's right.

Jon: They could have alphabetized it or something.

Tim: Yeah, that's right. Given us an index. What that tells us is that the purpose of these

laws is to help us understand the story. And the story is about, these are the terms of

the covenant relationship between God and ancient Israel by which they were to be

a kingdom of priests to the nations.

In the earliest Jesus communities, this became a huge point of contention because

the resurrected Jesus is king of all the nations and he commissions them to go out

to all the nations - his disciples, who were all Jewish. So very quickly there's this

debate going. "If I'm going to be a follower of Jesus the Jewish Messiah, do I need to

become an Israelite?"

Jon: And especially things like Sabbath...

Tim: Sabbath observance, circumcision of males or men.

Jon: Because these are really obvious outward signs. Like, you know when someone's

obeying the Sabbath or not really clearly it's to hang out with them for a week.

Tim: That's correct.

Jon: Or weekend.

Tim: Yeah, that's right. This is what the book of Acts, and what we discover in the letters

of Paul and Hebrews is that the early Jewish leaders of the Jesus movement

discerned; they believe by the leading of the spirit that non-Jewish followers of Jesus

the Jewish Messiah did not have to relate to God by those covenant terms because

Jesus through His death and resurrection reshaped the whole covenant story around

himself. Jesus himself actually summarize the purpose of all the laws in the Torah to

love God and love neighbor.

What we see is, yeah, non-Jewish converts weren't asked to also adhere to the

Sabbath or the kosher food diet. They can't if they want to. That's where the Jesus

movement landed is that it was a multi-ethnic movement, not just for Jewish people,

therefore, the terms of the covenant changed.

Jon: But as you read through these laws, and we'll get to more of them in Leviticus when

do that, and more in Numbers, but as you read through these laws, don't dismiss

them though. It's just like, "Okay, this is for ancient Israelites."

Tim: Right, right.

Jon: Because doesn't Paul there's like a lot of wisdom - God gave us wisdom?

Tim: Yeah. Moses says in Deuteronomy chapter 4 that if Israel lives by these laws, the

nations will look on and say, "What wise and understanding people who live by

these righteous laws that their God gave them." So, the laws contextualize to Iron

Age agricultural rural communities for the most part.

So they're not dropped out of heaven for everybody everywhere. They are very

specific to where Israel was as a nation. But they're a step forward in terms of

economics and justice. They really are. They're hard for us as modern readers

because we compare the laws to Western law that has been shaped by the ethic of

biblical law in history. So we look at them as backwards in that where they occur in

history, there really are at the cutting edge.

I've had this conversation so many times where people are like, "Really?" You read

some of the laws and they seem brutal, and you're like, "Well, if you live in ancient

Babylon, you would much prefer to live in ancient Israel in comparison."

Jon: It's a big step forward.

Tim: Yeah. So for us as modern readers, I think that's where we go to these laws to

discern wisdom. We see Paul the Apostle himself who says, "yeah, we don't live by

the terms of the Sinai covenant." But he will quote laws about what you do with your

ox. And then, he use it to provide guidance for Christians. That's in 1 Corinthians

chapter 9.

So he still uses the laws as a source of guidance and wisdom, but for wisdom not as

the terms by which he relates to God.

Jon: Cindy Felan just asked, "Did other ancient cultures adopt any of the Jewish laws?"

Tim: Oh, that's interesting. Well, in the ancient world like Second Temple period, we know

that the Jewish way of life was really attractive to many Greeks and Romans.

The Roman world was similar in many ways to the modern West because of their

road system, super mobile, disconnected. Families were as incoherent as the most

modern Western families. So the Jewish way of life, super family-centered and

traditional, a very clear worldview, moral. It was attractive.

Jon: Even now, I have a lot of friends who are not Jewish who like to keep Jewish festivals

and the Sabbath because of those reasons. Very family oriented, it's a beautiful way

to live. There's wisdom in that.

Tim: Absolutely, there's wisdom. I mean, I'm a pastor so I'm a huge advocate. I've

challenged my whole church to adopt a Sabbath practice. I do it myself. It's not the

terms by which I relate to Jesus, I don't think that he smiles on me more if I don't do

this, but I think I'm a stupid human if I don't learn the wisdom of Sabbath. I think

these laws are guiding us in a way to be wise humans.

There's wisdom in creating a sacred rhythm to our years and remembering our

foundation stories as families and as Christians, and building that into our calendar.

So that's all stuff you pick up from the laws.

Jon: Eva just asked, "Hammurabi's Code, is that similar to The Ten Commandments?

Tim: Yeah, it's really interesting. The Wikipedia, and Google it, the ancient Code of

Hammurabi which was a Babylonian king predates ancient Israel by a few centuries.

And what you find, there are numerous laws in this block of laws right here,

especially in chapters 22 and 23 of Exodus. There are almost verbatim to laws from

the Code of Hammurabi.

What it shows is that the way God is even instituting justice in Israel, it's situated in

Ancient Near Eastern culture. It's not dropped out of heaven. God is working with

Israel where they're at and then pushing them forward. So the Code of Hammurabi's

stuff, there's about a dozen laws that are nearly verbatim. It's really cool and


Jon: That's really interesting.

Tim: Yeah, totally.

Jon: There's a really tough question about did God changed His mind? I bet a lot of

people want to hear about that. Oh, that's Eva again.

Tim: Eva, you were the first one. Yeah, good question.

Jon: Good question.

Tim: But I see other people have asked about it too.

Jon: Here's how Eva said it. "If Moses could convince God to change His mind about

destroying Israelites, what does this indicate about God's sovereignty and being all-

knowing? Will He change His mind about our lives, too? I think that's a very practical


Tim: Correct.

Jon: But I think another way to kind of talk about this is, why discuss it and talk about it

as God changing His mind? That seems such a weird thing for us to say.

Tim: There's a narrative moment right here at the golden calf.

Jon: Yeah, set it up real quick.

Tim: The challenge here is there's a moment in this narrative of the golden calf where

God says he's going to do something and then He doesn't do it. And what we want

to do is abstract that moment out of the story.

Jon: Someone just said podcast mode. So I just was smiling about that. We're on podcast


Tim: We are on podcast mode. We want to talk about a philosophical question about

God's changeability or something. That's interesting that the story is not trying to

answer that speculative question.

Jon: About whether God can change His mind or not?

Tim: Yes. The point is, how committed is God to His covenant promises even when His

covenant partners completely fail and are unfaithful to Him? So what God says is

he's angry at Israel for violating the terms of the covenant. I mean, this would be like

if you sign a contract with a business partner, and then they go out from the

meeting and go...

Jon: Or it's like you get married and you have the covenant, and then as soon as you say,

"I do," you sneak away.

Tim: The husband sneaks out on the honeymoon and goes sleeping around.

Jon: That's how bad it is.

Tim: That's the gravity of this story.

Jon: And so, God is sitting here going, "Really guys? I'm over this."

Tim: He says, first of all, that He's angry. And then He tells Moses, he says, "Leave me

alone I'm going to destroy them."

If you've ever had somebody break your heart, that's exactly how he feels. I don't

know if you have problems with the fact that God apparently feels deep, deep

emotions and will express them verbally, but that's precisely what the narrative is

depicting. That especially God feels the pain of broken relationships on a deep level

and He verbalizes is them before you act on them, which is good news for us.

And then, what's interesting is who does he tell that to? He verbalizes it to Moses.

Now, I don't know if you've ever had this moment or relationship, where things are

tense and where you saying to somebody like, “Leave me alone," but it's actually the

last thing in the world you want them to do is to leave you alone.

What Moses does immediately is respond by saying no, he won't leave this matter

alone. And what happens is, essentially, that God in this argument ends up inviting

Moses in to a role of partner in how the covenant gets preserved. And Moses says

no for two reasons: Bad PR, bad public relations

Jon: That is the second reason, right.

Tim: That's the second reason. One second. I think it's actually the first.

Jon: Okay.

Tim: Yeah, the first one is bad PR with the Egyptians.

Jon: You're not going look in?

Tim: Yeah, you're not going to look in. "You just rescued these people and now you're

going to destroy them?" First of all, it's not good on your name. Then second of all,

remember the covenant you swore to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob that you're going

to bless all the nations through these people.

Jon: But the covenant specifically will say, "If you do these things." So he's appealing to a

covenant that they broke. So God could walk away from the covenant, right?

Tim: Yes. But what Moses is reminding God about is the covenant with Abraham.

Jon: With Abraham that had no conditions.

Tim: He says, "Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob?"

Jon: Yeah, okay. Because that covenant didn't have conditions which said, "I'm going to

do this."

Tim: Essentially, what the story is asking us to entertain is there is a deep conflict within

God's own heart about the human story. That He's committed to partnering with

humans and that the future of the universe won't take place apart from humans. But

He also has signed up knowingly with humans who are unfaithful and who are going

to betray Him, which makes Him really brokenhearted?

And so what does God do? He doesn't bail. He also doesn't act on his emotions


Jon: He also doesn't act like a robot and pretend He doesn't care, and He's like, "Well, I'm

going to do it anyway because I promised."

Tim: Yeah. He also just doesn't dismiss it like, "Oh, no big deal. Israelite will be Israelite."

They're evil, and idolatry is real, and it's destructive. And so, the story is setting up

this tension within God's own being that is going get resolved later on in the story,

because who's going to be the faithful covenant partner that God's looking for? The

Israel right from the beginning is not. And that's where then incarnation becomes

such a powerful moment in the story.

Jon: The incarnation of Jesus.

Tim: Where Jesus becomes the faithful Israelite covenant partner that the nation was

called to be, but never failed to be. So God has to become His own human covenant


Jon: He shakes His own hands.

Tim: So in terms of changing His mind, what God does not do is changed His mind with

regard to His long-term covenant purposes. But He might not actually go through

with this specific deal with Israel.

Tim: Yeah. It's interesting. There are multiple times where God warn somebody about

judgment, or says, "I'm going to judge," and either there's an intercessor or the

people repent. And those are the moments where we hear God relented were

changed His disposition. God never changes His mind. That word is never used to

describe God.

Jon: Whether He's going to be faithful to his own promises?

Tim: Correct. It's always with regard to judgment.

Jon: Interesting.

Tim: "I'm going to judge." Somebody repents, or somebody intercedes, then God

changes His mind. So God will change His mind about judging people; He will never

change His mind about blessing people. That's the storyline of the Bible.

Jon: That's interesting. Then should we take away from that that we should intercede a

lot for His justice not to come?

Tim: I think before we get into that, we just say, Moses becomes this model prophetic

intercessor. And what the story sets you up is that, boy, where would God's people

be without somebody to stand in that place in the role of interceptor?

And what it sets you up for is for the role of Israel's prophets in the story as this gobetween

but ultimately for the Messianic prophet king who will covenant with David

and that God will appoint a king to play this very role on behalf of the people.

Jon: Namely Jesus.

Tim: And then that merges into the suffering servant. I think this is creating a... it’s almost

like a "help wanted" sign is Moses' role here of saying, "Dear reader, if this story is

going to move forward, we better have a Moses type person to inquire within -

Moses like intercessor."

Jon: Scott said, "I'm going to admit when it comes to interceding against judgment, I'm a

lot more like Jonah than Moses."

Tim: Yeah, totally. How do you think Moses felt? My goodness.

Jon: He was pretty bummed too. That's a very honest reaction.

Tim: These chapters reveal something so powerful. Oh, and that's why right after God

forgives...Well, He brings judgment actually, when we talk about that, but He

forgives then He restates the covenant, repeats a bunch of the laws. And then we get

the most requoted line throughout the whole Old Testament stated in God describes

himself after the golden calf incident in Exodus 34:6-7. Which is "the Lord is gracious

and compassionate. He's slow to anger. He's abounding and covenant faithfulness.

He loves to forgive, but he won't let those..."

Jon: It's written right here.

Tim: Oh yeah, there it is. He won't leave the wicked unpunished. This becomes the

summary statement that we learn about God's character. And there's way, way more

covenant compassion, and forgiveness language than there is anything else.

So what we walk away from Mount Sinai learning is that God has signed up for a

whole long story of getting wounded and hurt by His faithful people. But that's

worth it to God and he'll put up with it to accomplish His plan in the long run.

Jon: And so this moment with Moses interceding is setting up this need for an

interceptor, which then points to Jesus?

Tim: Correct.

Jon: That's awesome.

Tim: Yes, it is awesome. The Bible is awesome one. It's so profound.

Jon: It's one unified story that leads to Jesus.

Tim: That's right.

Jon: We got 15 more minutes. What else do we have?

Tim: I picked out some other questions. One of them was that I read something in


Jon: Oh.

Tim: So I thought I'll read the gods description of himself in Exodus chapter 34. And this

is for any of you geeks. Exodus 34:6-7 is the most reused and re-quoted line within

the Old Testament. It's quoted about a dozen more times in the Psalms and

prophets and other books. Anyway. Here you go.

Jon: Let's do it.

Tim: Great.




Jon: I now feel like I'm a character in Lord of the Rings or something.

Tim: I just read in Elvish.

Jon: That sounds like Elvish or something. That was Hebrew, not Elvish.

Tim: Yeah. So beautiful. Let's see. Jonathan O, you had a question about the manna. The

famous manna that the Israelites ate in the wilderness is mentioned here in the

wilderness for the first time.

Jon: What is it?

Tim: We talked about it actually in the video on Numbers because it plays a big role in

the stories there. Well, what is it? Because it's good. See it's like a Bachelor's in Bible

of theology. Jon, what is the Hebrew meaning of the word manna?

Jon: What is it?

Tim: The manna occurs right here. He leads Israelites, they grumble about being thirsty.

They grumble about not having meat. They say, "Oh, we were back in Egypt sitting

by pots of meat.

Jon: A pot of meat.

Tim: And leeks and onions.

Jon: And now they got this stuff that you're just like, "What's that?"

Tim: So what God provides is manna. It's not described in Exodus. It's described in a little

bit more detail in Numbers as some kind of sticky, yellowish resin-like substance.

Jon: That doesn't sound appetizing.

Tim: No. It would appear like dew. Like the morning dew would evaporate, and it would

be this resin crust on the ground. What's going on there?

Jon: It was such a confusing and I guess not appetizing thing that the name forever was

just, what is that?

Tim: Ryan says, "Instant mashed potatoes from heaven with no water." "Add milk," says

David. First of all, whatever the Israelites experienced in the wilderness, they didn't

have even language for it. So we just need to let that be what it is. But obviously, in

the story, it becomes the fact that Israel's existence as a nation comes as just the

daily provision of God's grace as He carries them through the wilderness.

And so Moses will pick up the significance of the manna in the book of

Deuteronomy, that Israel doesn't live just by bread alone—and then he recalls the

manna story—but rather they exist by the Word of God.

So, Israel lived hand to mouth in the wilderness, and that's a really significant part of

their story. That's why they recall to such extreme generosity with the laws because

they know what it's like to live hand to mouth. I think actually Jesus in the Lord's

Prayer alludes to the manna with the Daily Bread.

Jon: You think that?

Tim: Yeah, absolutely.

Jon: Oh, cool.

Tim: What he's saying is, a follower of Jesus is someone who treats each day's life and

food as a gift. You don't take it for granted. You intentionally live as if you live hand

to mouth. Even if you don't, you say this daily prayer Give us today our daily bread

to recognize that that's the reality. Even if I pretend like I'm okay and everything

stable, the reality is I live like the Israelites in the wilderness. For sure that's what he's

alluding to.

Jon: Which is such a crazy way to try to live. I mean, that's hard.

Tim: It is hard. It's super hard.

Jon: That's like so much faith.

Tim: The Israelites in the wilderness is a huge theme that gets picked up all throughout

the rest of the Bible: prophets, Psalms, and New Testament. Anyway, good question

Jonathan. That was good. That was good stuff.

Jon: Yeah. What else do we have?

Tim: Greg Lusby. This comes following back to the laws about our conversation earlier

but he asked, "Did God expect the Israelites to actually follow and obey all of the

covenant laws?

Jon: Like, "Did God just gave them the laws knowing this is going to be too much for you

but this is something to shoot for?" Is that what he's saying?

Tim: What's interesting is that especially modern readers of the laws, they are so foreign

to us culturally and there's so many of them all in one spot in the Torah that—

Jon: It seems ridiculous to try to follow them.

Tim: Correct. Totally. And there's one layer of that, that's just kind of like a bit of a closeminded

cultural arrogance because there are many cultures that live by really, really

different traditions and practices. Here's one right here, but for some reason, we're

kind of like...and I'm not saying, Greg, that this was the intent of your question. But it

made me think of multiple times where I've been teaching or something, and people

are like, "Yeah, sure, glad I don't have to live under those laws." That's like, "Well, I

understand that, but at the same time, they're really remarkable. And given their

point in history, these laws would have felt like a shelter if you had been living—

Jon: The way it protects women more than other cultures and orphans and widows, and

the justice involved.

Tim: Yeah. So yeah, life in ancient Israel was way better than life in ancient Egypt because

of these laws. So yes, I think God gives the laws with a full expectation that the

Israelites will live by them.

There's one sense in which it was attainable. Israel, throughout their biblical history,

in the First Temple period they did not. Second Temple period—

Jon: They locked it down.

Tim: Yeah. I mean Paul the Apostle, he's not for being a follower of Jesus. He said, "Listen,

when I was a Pharisee, I was blameless with regard to following the laws." But even

he can recognize that even though he could say that imprint he was blameless, in his

heart he knows that he was an idolater along with the rest.

Jon: And that was Jesus point?

Tim: Totally. So he did expect them to live by the laws but that they didn't wasn't a

surprise. That's the part of the point of the story.

Jon: And if you live by all the laws, which was the expectation, it doesn't mean you're a

perfect person because underneath that you could still be an idolater and adulterer.

Tim: That's what Romans chapter 2 and 3 is all about.

Jon: Cool. So yes, Israel is supposed to follow the laws.

Tim: Yes, they were, and they were held accountable for not doing it.

Jon: Thanks for listening to this episode of The Bible Project podcast. You can find all of

our videos on our YouTube channel, youtube.com/thebibleproject. And you can find

lots of free resources like study guides, full resolution posters at thebibleproject.com.

Thanks for being a part of this with us.

For advanced bible reading tools:
Login  or  Join
Which language would you like?